Saturday, January 14, 2006

That's not art!


No-one is immune to the shock of contemporary art. It strays so far from the mainstream that sometimes we can't help thinking that it might not be art at all. It's imposter art. People only think it's art, it's really something else. But if we are to judge what is and isn't art, then shouldn't we be able to come up with a definition of art? Shouldn't there be a defining feature that makes something an artwork? In other words, what makes an artwork, art?

To answer this question, we need to find something that is common to every single work of art: an essence of art. You might think "Well, every artwork is created by an artist, so something is a work of art if it is created by an artist". Unfortunately, this definition is circular:

What is an artwork? Something created by an artist. What is an artist? Someone who creates artworks. What is an artwork....

So this definition gets us nowhere unless we can define what an artist is.

It's pretty hard to find something that is common to every piece of artwork, and yet we always seem to know what is and isn't art. How do we know? How do we know that the Mona Lisa is an artwork? Is it because it is in a gallery? That can't be right - there are some artworks that are never exhibited in a gallery, and yet they still seem to be works of art.

The quest for finding the common feature to every artwork has proven to be so difficult that some philosophers have given up entirely. Instead, they suggest a family-tree explanation of our ability to detect "art"; it's similar to the way we recognise people from families. For example, imagine that the Smith family have particularly large noses and small eyes. These features make them easy to distinguish from others. The aunts, uncles, cousins are not so easy to recognise. Some of them have the same small eyes, some of them have the particularly large nose. But once we can pick them out, we can pick out even more distant relatives, and so on. The story is the same with art. We are all well aware that Renaissance paintings are art. Impressionist paintings, however, are different because the images are blurred. But we can still recognise them because they're still painted with oil on canvas. It has now gotten to the point where we can recognise Andy Warhol's Brillo Boxes as art (although it debatable as to whether it is).

So there is no essence to art after all. It's art if it's only similar to what we traditionally recognise as art. Actually, there is one potential essentialist theory of art, and this is given by Arthur Danto. In his argument, he uses Brillo Boxes (shown above) to illustrate his point.

Brillo Boxes represents the edge of art. If it was on the family tree of art, it would be the most distant relative. It is completely on the border because it is indistinguishable from a stack of Brillo Boxes at a supermarket. The boxes are actually made out of plywood, and were painted by the artist, but this does not concern us because we are interested in finding out how we can distinguish art by just looking. There is one crucial difference between Warhol's boxes and the boxes at the supermarket: behind Warhol's painted boxes is a theory of art. In fact, behind every single work of art is a theory of art. Even behind the cave paintings at Lascaux. And this, Danto argues, is the essential feature of art. When we see the Brillo boxes at the supermarket, we see a stack of Brillo boxes. But when we see Warhol's Brillo boxes, we see something else. There is something which is much more intriguing and exiting about the artwork, and that is it's conceptual component.

It's a neat theory because it suggests that there is such a thing as art, and it gives us the ability to determine what is and isn't art. The only problem with Danto's theory is that it pre-supposes that Brillo Boxes is an artwork. Brillo Boxes is a work that quite a few people would protest as not being art. I'll leave this up to the reader to decide.

It is important to note that just because it is art, it is not necessarily good art.

Further Reading:

  • Danto, A., 1964, "The Artistic Enfranchisement of Real Objects: The Artworld", Journal of Philosophy 61, no. 19, pp. 571 - 84
  • Kennick,W, 1958, "Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake?", Mind 67, pp. 317 - 334

12 comments:

Doctor Marco said...

My personal opinion regarding art us as follows. It has to express some opinion, emotion or idea. Anyone can be an artist so as he/she expresses what I have just said in any form. That does not mean that someone, who is recognized as an artist, can do whatever he wants and call it art. It has to have a meaning. The meaning has to be explained and has to be obvious to the observer. If the observer does not see the meaning, the concept of art vanishes.

Urakoze said...

In my opinion, art is something that serves no physical or mechanical purpose. Rather, it is something stationary and entirely visual. It may be created to communicate some message, express certain emotions, or simply to invoke a subconcious feeling in it's viewers. It's purpose is to reach the right brain.

Walker from... said...

I don't think art ought to be obvious, but I personally believe (as in, when I work, I try to achieve this...) that this "meaning" to which you refer ought not to be obtuse.

Jeff said...

Art is a good scam. People pay large sums of money for crap that they think has some deep meaning. I personally hate art, but I have to respect artists because they do a good job pretending like their work has a meaning.

Anonymous said...

Art is a great way to make a living if you cannot discover a useful way to make money.

Dr. Ruxin said...

Most pieces of art do not have a meaning that applies to most aspects of life. Today, artists create anything and just claim that it is art, because art can be anything. Claiming to be an artist does not make everything you create art. Artists beleive they are gods. They believe that everything they touch is gold.

luke a said...

the family tree idea made me think of deleuze's rhizome ideas, which also pertain to the evolution of creative practices.

ninest123 said...

air max, sac longchamp, ray ban sunglasses, longchamp pas cher, ugg boots, ray ban sunglasses, nike free, oakley sunglasses, nike free, chanel handbags, cheap oakley sunglasses, nike outlet, louboutin, longchamp, nike roshe run, air jordan pas cher, tiffany jewelry, longchamp outlet, longchamp outlet, michael kors, prada outlet, louis vuitton outlet, louboutin outlet, louis vuitton, uggs on sale, ugg boots, louis vuitton, polo ralph lauren outlet, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton, kate spade outlet, louboutin pas cher, polo ralph lauren outlet, tory burch outlet, tiffany and co, oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, ralph lauren pas cher, christian louboutin outlet, nike air max, nike air max, louboutin shoes, replica watches, jordan shoes, oakley sunglasses, gucci outlet, prada handbags, burberry, replica watches, louis vuitton outlet

ninest123 said...

ray ban uk, vanessa bruno, sac guess, air force, tn pas cher, coach outlet, michael kors, burberry outlet online, nike blazer, lululemon, vans pas cher, mulberry, michael kors, burberry, nike free run uk, nike roshe, ray ban pas cher, michael kors outlet, hollister pas cher, hollister, north face, hermes, new balance pas cher, coach purses, true religion outlet, nike air max, replica handbags, ugg boots, michael kors outlet, hogan, nike air max, true religion jeans, abercrombie and fitch, kate spade handbags, lacoste pas cher, true religion jeans, michael kors outlet, converse pas cher, coach outlet, timberland, nike air max, michael kors, ugg boots, michael kors outlet, true religion jeans, north face, michael kors, ralph lauren uk, oakley pas cher, michael kors outlet

ninest123 said...

wedding dresses, giuseppe zanotti, instyler, mont blanc, converse outlet, longchamp, babyliss, north face outlet, north face outlet, insanity workout, gucci, vans, hollister, asics running shoes, chi flat iron, ralph lauren, baseball bats, bottega veneta, timberland boots, mac cosmetics, valentino shoes, abercrombie and fitch, mcm handbags, hollister, lululemon, nike air max, hollister, celine handbags, herve leger, ghd, louboutin, soccer jerseys, p90x workout, beats by dre, vans shoes, ray ban, nike air max, nike trainers, new balance, ferragamo shoes, nike huarache, reebok shoes, lancel, nfl jerseys, nike roshe, oakley, iphone cases, jimmy choo shoes, birkin bag, soccer shoes

ninest123 said...

bottes ugg, ugg pas cher, louis vuitton, pandora jewelry, moncler, moncler, doudoune canada goose, replica watches, louis vuitton, moncler, juicy couture outlet, moncler, juicy couture outlet, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, canada goose, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, pandora charms, canada goose, links of london, canada goose outlet, pandora charms, canada goose uk, canada goose, marc jacobs, moncler, wedding dresses, louis vuitton, canada goose outlet, karen millen, louis vuitton, moncler outlet, sac louis vuitton pas cher, coach outlet, moncler, swarovski, ugg boots uk, toms shoes, moncler, pandora jewelry, canada goose, montre pas cher, thomas sabo, supra shoes, hollister, swarovski crystal

dong dong23 said...

coach factory outlet
coach outlet
ugg boots
michael kors outlet clearance
coach outlet
polo ralph lauren uk
cheap ugg boots
fitflops outlet
ugg boots clearance
ugg australia
201711.10wengdongdong